FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1)

De~men~shun~alism[!]

Bohemian gravity!

Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, ,  Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,

Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?

* compactified?

The catch may be in the fold.  The pun is in the journalism.  The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics.  The point is: what is a dimension?  Not to mention: what is a point?  A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective.  A point has no dimension.  Two points represent 1 dimension or a line.   Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions.  Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space.  But dimensions are one level below the point. 

Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension.  But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).

1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}

4MAT Shift?

Hyper-Dig?^

~ of 6 links)
Spoiler alert: ala FP? Or legend of sorts...
The (#'s) below are the sequence of inserting above.
The M-beds within are links to blog searches of this blog.**

(4.) April 23rd, Openly Secular Day!
(1.) The Labor Market Conundrum: The Cyclical And The Secular
(2.) What Would Don Draper Do? Reading Dante in a Secular Age
(5.) Document Proclaims Secular Government
(6.) Mullahs and Heretics [!]
(3.) The Godless Delusion*

* Bingo: Started Reading!
** these italics are bibliographing in progress

Cyclical A. F'N Too Point Oh[!], B. Proof of Life..., C. In "F"n able?, D. Politics is local?, E. Rubber/Glue "Unhinged".
Reading A. A counting Trick? , B. Long Story
Document A. escapement?, B. Absolut(ist)ly..., C. Temporal, D. Two Birds
and A. Reality is the 4D., B. The dig?*** , C. Better Business Bureau
[!] A. Being a Blank "is Hard Work".
delusion A. TIP OF THE FLAME , B. But for Angle , C. Phase II?

*** anomaly of (sc)

Cyclical B:art ~ Rib~L [*~*]

^ 3-26-15
The Dig ? 2b Kantinued ?
1,2,
5, The Vox: Cruz Control?
3,4,
6. Progressive Values: Ctrl F Reich

All Flat Statements Are Wrong.

Paradox or naut? 

(fn?) 1. googled phrase in heading
2. facebooked Philosphy Now
3. blogsearched PN
Re:labels

Translation: 3 points determine a plane *
hint/d'ribble: 4d fair lane ?
[two ends against reality?]


tag: all flat statements are wrong
 
* is not a flat statement
3 points are a plane is a flat statement
to determine takes another dimension

A flat statement only has three points in one plane. 
noun + verb ~ has more than three dimensions
noun + verb ~ maybe true (knot?)







FYI: possibly the grand conundrum
A statement of what is flat takes another perspective.
Therefore it is not flat, therefore outside this plane statement.

Meta4 V 4D

Social engineering is an unwise-crack.
Social Darwinism knot. 
That gets the tug of war out of the way[?]


Original rough gnote*: Con Sciousness.






*gnostic crack or Gödel Escher Bach? Dough a deer? 


U.C. /A-G 7th


[7-28-14 Bohemian Gravity]

Chez V (slash) 4D

Cap'n Trade $d up[?]
Quant'um Edges?
Rough D'raft[!]
Meta4 v 4D
ChezV[!]


Space is 3D or x,y,z
T is the 4th D
The 1st three are perpendiculars.
The 4th is the chez v of the 3. 
Point tangent. Chez V consciousness?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD5hhErLcqw


UC- *


 [* Bohemian Gravity 7-28-14 Reboot?]

Reality is the 4D.

[Rough Draft 6-3-14]

The politics of nature.
X, Y & Z R physics, psychology & philosophy.
Each an acronimble player[!]*

*to parse disciplines & unfuzz math/logic.

~~~
Edited 6-4-14 [!]

The fourth dimention is politics, in the pantheon of disciplines. 
A. Physics
B. Psychology
C. Philosophy
D. Politics

X, Y and Z, plus time are the four dimensions in 4 moolah shun.
Spoiler alert:  The fifth element ?**

** not exactly

Footnotes Page One JUNE 2014

Note to self: Check Labels.
6-3-14 (c-note above 'n Re: Hegel Popper) and reference Epicyclical Poet Tree , Bury the lede?
Knot to mention 4th die men shun. Perpendicularity, Time and Space?  OW: Geometry of Purpose

6-4-14: C-note Re-self. (slide to 6-1) (& rest of FP labels)
Redux: A Long Season of ... , Inconvenient Recall? , Location, location, location. , Reality is the 4D.
Re:b.s.[!]  (FP2)

FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2014

1-2-14  Knot to begin with Zor(R)o aster.*

1-5-14 ... Enterprise: Ezra Klein Project.
* 1-6-14  line pulled from uncertain post

1-10-14 [Closed Cap shun ? ] 1.The Hope'd4 Campaign , Snooze Alarm ,   2.Strike the Right..., CAD (Culturally Aided Design), C.In Balance... D.Political Football  3. The State of Religion? , CAD (Culturally Aided Design)   4. The Hegel Myth and Its Method

 

e 0

1-14-14 : It is not just 42itUS {a} we hold at 18 links.  No I was not hinting on the green or the rough.  I just did not feel like stopping at 13, not to be a #erologist, 3Erologist or numberologist.  The 18 links are 6462^ in their groupings, but those were not 4c'd 2 meet my model.  (i.e. there are now 6 edges.) Or was it about 4d Fair Lane?

1-16-14 : See Labels: Original Game Theory(1st use) Field Theory, Tetrahe..., TOW('at?)

^ Did Douglas Adams know Arthur Dantos and did Andrew Dice Clay* know either?  It may be somewhat of a popperism. You can't have Popperism without the prism. ? ?

*kNOT: Technically Rex Wiener ?  ? ? 

Geometry ?

Knot Even

A Case !*

I seemed to have been blogging in my sleep again.  In fact, I felt like I was even extending some unconscious blog or other draft work. Now, it was not my intent that 4 words(forwards?) be the case, but there was something about the self-reference("this sentence is false") being a bit ungrammatical.  I could just be me, but it is about self-reference, and dreams can undo that. OW, that was a role. But back from my Tan gent or Go sine.** (it seams) In order to be true or false would it not need another reference*** to be true or false? That is my case, and I will 4go any pun on M-beds in bed or post you lates or quad.

*search (six of one)
**(a bit anacronistic) at this point I note that "this sentence is" are actually 3 self references.
*** see 4D 'n perspective other ? ?

Over Helming.

[6-24-11 The lack of pomp and need for circumstance*(or circumdecision?)
President Obama on the Way Forward in Afghanistan(video)
Just an aftergoogle. But I will add that Randi Rhodes gave an impressive perspective on the President's remarks, not necessarily here, but it is reflected a bit in the video of the Democrats bringing it home.]

Please note the navigational metaphor in Professor John Kay's interview in the context of Professor Ha-Joon Chang's interview and the Bib Leo File of Republic Cons.
Inter-Dimentionalism and Ge Oh Metricks not so aside: The 6Sigma of Newt needs a pinnacle of purpose. i.e. there truly needs to be a navigational approach. Not akin to "rocket science"**, but having an aim and the model to chart it. My point is that 6 Sigma does not have a point, or rather a point is needed a priori for it to work. Actually it is not about the 6 edges of a tetrahedron, but the break down of the bell curve. If it were only about the bell curve it might have a point. My point is that politics has a point of balancing power and processing the point. But from a freedom perspective is that a goal? But from a navigational perspective there is a need for a 3D grid plus time and processing. The six edges of a tetradedron reflect the 4D dynamics of the process, that is not the goal. The goal is out there, the dream or unrealized principles if you will. The balance or base is the Try Angle*** and dynamics of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy(also processes as well as subjects) for realizing our balance of powers and dreams.

* an after link: NY Times from Randi Rhodes Blog
(also TPM)
** after bolds(4) in original post
*** pun on 3 points determine a plane(and tripod) but a 4th point determines 3 dimensions. Not to mention the Geo of Risk and Robustness of Nassim Taleb. He must not be taken out of context. Reducing debt does not mean reducing spending and economics is not the most efficient determinant. "(nature) it seems very inefficient for an economist but it is robust"(...)"I want society...to be more robust and more open to up side." My only point is that society(politics see "science" bold following "rocket") has a place in determining the rules that provide the circumstances.]